Tag Archives: misclassification

Bojangles’ Assistant Managers Sue for Overtime

bojangles' overtime assistant managers

Two assistant managers who worked at a North Carolina Bojangles’ restaurant are suing the famous southern food chain for failing to pay them overtime.  The assistant managers argue that they were not actually managers and spent most of their time cleaning, taking orders, serving customers, and preparing, cooking, and packaging food.  Although they worked approximately fifty hours per week, Bojangles’ always paid the assistant managers the same set salary every week.

The law requires employers to pay employees overtime pay for hours worked over forty per week.  Overtime pay is equal to one and one-half (1.5) times an employee’s regular hourly rate of pay.  Employers can get in trouble with the law when they pay employees on a fixed weekly salary, because it does not cover overtime pay.

If several requirements are met, managers fall under an exception to the law and do not have to be paid overtime.  To fall under the exception, a restaurant “manager” must perform certain duties, such as directing the work of other employees, setting employees’ pay rates and work schedules, hiring and firing employees, and recommending the promotion or demotion of employees.  Managers should also have the power to act on behalf of the restaurant by, for example, ordering food on its behalf.  An employee who does not perform these duties and is simply called a “manager” or “assistant manager” does not fall under the exemption and must be paid overtime.  This is known as “misclassification.”

The Bojangles’ assistant managers claim that they were misclassified because they were paid a fixed weekly salary even though they did not perform the work duties of true managers.  Accordingly, they argue that Bojangles’ owes them and 400 other assistant managers unpaid overtime wages.  The lawsuit is pending in federal court in North Carolina.

 

Golden Corral Sued By Assistant Managers For Overtime Pay

Golden Corral logo

Golden Corral restaurants throughout the United States misclassified “Kitchen Associate Managers,” and “Hospitality Managers,” as employees exempt from overtime, failing to pay them any overtime wages for hours they worked over forty in a given workweek. According to the restaurant workers, Golden Corral refused to pay them overtime in spite of the fact that they spent the majority of their time performing the same duties that non-exempt restaurant employees performed, including cooking and preparing food, taking out trash, washing dishware and glassware, refilling food on the buffet line, unpacking products and supplies, cleaning the restaurant, and serving customers. The lawsuit claims that Golden Corral applied the same compensation and employment policies to Assistant Managers at 94 restaurants across the country.

The workers also claim that Golden Corral willfully misclassified them as exempt workers ineligible for overtime pay, and was aware that Associate Managers across the country worked more than 40 hours a week without overtime compensation. The lawsuit alleges that Golden Corral failed to record all of the time that its employees worked and purposefully did not require workers to clock in or out or otherwise record their time in any way. Further, the Assistant Managers’ work hours were not recorded on their paystubs.

Jack in the Box Allegedly Misclassifies Managers To Avoid Overtime Pay

jack in the Box Logo

Jack in the Box has misclassified its store managers as overtime ineligible in order to cut its overtime pay obligations, according to a lawsuit filed in California federal court. The lawsuit claims that Jack in the Box, through a central business policy, requires its store managers to cover many work tasks of their subordinate employees. These assignments include working the drive-thru and the fryer, preparing food, cleaning up, and unloading products, as well as other like jobs. The store managers claim that despite performing these overtime pay eligible tasks, Jack in the Box mischaracterized them as ineligible for OT pay and has not paid them what they are owed. The lawsuit alleges that as result of this system, store managers were also regularly prevented from taking meal and rest breaks because they were assigned too much work and given no relief.

Jack in the Box allegedly paid its store managers a fixed salary amount that ultimately ended up being less than the minimum wage. Further, the store managers claim they were denied overtime pay although they “regularly” worked more than eight hours in a day or 40 hours in a workweek. They also claim that Jack in the Box did not reimburse them expenses for necessary travel costs in moving products between restaurants, and that they are not paid their fully owed wages upon the termination of their employment.